Ace five blackjack strategy
Red 7 vs. Ace-Five I'm a casual player and don't play that much, or for much money, however I've learned basic strategy and feel comfortable to move into card counting, at least lightly. Which is how I came across Ace-Five. So when you’re using the ace five count, you’ll simply start with 0, and you’ll add 1 to the count every time a five is dealt. You’ll subtract 1 every time an ace is dealt. When the count is positive, you’ll have the advantage, so you’ll increase your bet. Jul 09, · For your situation, I recommend dumping Ace - Five for one of the following two options: 1. If you don't have a lot of time before your trip, junk Counting altogether and concentrate on perfecting Basic Strategy. There's much easier ways to improve your bottom line than learning to Count.
Forums New posts Search forums. All of my suggestions are Unbalanced, so you don't need a true count conversion. Gambler72K New Member Jan 17, When you reach a point where you've doubled your money, or have neared this goal, don't continue to bet on the streak but on the card count , by dropping your bet, or just cashout the win. All rights reserved. A lot of people recommend hi-lo specifically because it really is just about as simple as red 7 and REKO.
Ace/Five Count Question
Be aware that posts do not always involve card counting and that general gambling discussion is welcome. Casino promotions posts are allowed only as links in text posts with meaningful user content in the body.
Basic Strategy Calculator. Red 7 vs. Ace-Five self. I'm a casual player and don't play that much, or for much money, however I've learned basic strategy and feel comfortable to move into card counting, at least lightly. Which is how I came across Ace-Five. Simple enough, sure, but almost everywhere you look blackjack players will say "why even bother", "not worth the effort just do hi-lo", etc I see the Red 7 method recommended alot as an alternative to Ace-Five, as still being simple but more effective than Ace-Five.
However, after looking into it, Red 7 seems to be just as complex as hi-lo, just without true count. Is there some other difference between Red 7 and hi-lo besides eliminating true count?
For the record, I know hi-lo, hi opt, etc Any other good systems comparable to Ace-Five in terms of simplicity? REKO is also very simple indeed to use. Only a tiny number of deviations to learn. In trials it is apparently virtually as strong as hi-lo. A lot of people recommend hi-lo specifically because it really is just about as simple as red 7 and REKO.
I have been practicing using those sheets for a week or so. However, the betting system requires a big bankroll i. Would that modification work? Also, if I sat at a table and barely played, would that be bad? Please give me your feedback. The A-5 is a waste of time IMO. Blackjacked Member Jun 12, Usually an ace will come out when the count is good, but another player will get it, or worse of all, the dealer snags it. You have to be prepared for these possibilities, so don't bet so high! Don't raise any higher, because there's no guarantee you'll get the blackjack, and then you're stuck losing against a dealers blackjack which is no good at all.
Blackjacked, with such a small spread and a weak count, I doubt that you're playing a winning game in the long run. Blackjacked said:. Don't raise any higher, because there's no guarantee you'll get the blackjack , and then you're stuck losing against a dealers blackjack which is no good at all. Blackjacked Member Jun 13, Proof is in this past six months I've visited casinos 31 times and won 27 of the visits. Blackjacked Member Jun 14, That depends on the other players at the table playing their hand right to maintain a good flow of cards, leaving after four losses or a bad shoe, and basic strategy variance in relation to the card count.
Positive count though, play basic strategy Also in the positive counts player should not hit 13 versus a 2, 15 or 16 versus a 10, or 15 versus a 7. In the negative counts never double down 11 versus a 10 or Ace, also on double downs on splits double for less in the negative counts, to absorb possible losses in the negative counts.
After a win when the count is positive add to your bet in a progressive style, utilizing a winning streak to rake in the chips, or to just double your brought money. When you reach a point where you've doubled your money, or have neared this goal, don't continue to bet on the streak but on the card count , by dropping your bet, or just cashout the win.
Casinos don't usually urge you to exploit situations where they're vulnerable. Like splitting sevens in blackjack when the dealer has a six showing or doubling on a 10 against a dealer five. The only bet they print right on the blackjack layout, that the dealer always asks if you want, is insurance. Nobody hypes insurance to do you a favor.
It's high-profit for the house If the dealer draws ace-up, you can "take insurance" after the deal, before any hands are played.
Bet up to half your original wager and win 2-to-1 if the dealer has blackjack. Some players, viewing these possibilities, conclude insurance is a good bet because three win, two lose, and one pushes.
Others like insurance when they have blackjack to lock up a win, rather than win one way and tie the other. Both analyses are what statisticians call "anecdotal" and the conclusions defy the laws of probability. Insurance, pure and simple, is a bet the hole card has a value. Using insurance to protect other bets doesn't alter this fact. So, in evaluating insurance, nothing else matters. If cards came from an infinite shoe, you'd average four values for every nine others.
This makes odds nine-to-four against the hole card being a For most purposes, the six and eight deck shoes dealt at most blackjack tables might as well be infinite.